Multimedia

Pic of Che

Creator unknown. Relevant to the story.

How many of you read this simply because it had a picture? Keep that in mind.

I have noticed an interesting phenomenon. As I’ve said before, I’m a big fan of Ben “Yahtzee” Croshaw’s series Zero Punctuation. If you’ve never seen it before, click the link and watch any video, it doesn’t matter which. Then come back, sit down, and shut up, I got shit to say.

Now that you’ve seen one, you probably picked up on a few things.

A: It’s funny.

B: He talks quickly and with a lot of emotion.

C: There’s a lot of animated pictures moving around to the story.

Here’s the funny part: I’ve recently started reading the text counterpart called Extra Punctuation that Yahtzee produces, and they aren’t as good as ZP. Which is odd, seeing that the quality of writing for both is pretty much even. This confused me at first, but then I realized: People don’t like it just for the jokes, they like the pictures, the music, the sounds, the voices. Yes, I realize that ZP is more intended for humor than review compared to EP, but it’s a comparatively minor point and the example still stands. Quiet, I’m trying to make a point

It’s also a much more passive system, which people seem to prefer. Another example of this is the forums at the Escapist (I’m going to reference the Escapist a lot, I frequent it and so should you. Look for me, Catalyst6). You make a forum topic like any other, but you also have the option to make a poll. This causes the thread to show up in the listings with a little icon on the left indicating that there is a poll. This is kind of standard, I suppose.

The odd thing is that these threads with polls, without fail, will get a massive number of views compared to normal, non-polling threads. I am guilty of this myself, I sometimes find that I am clicking on threads simply because they have the little rising bar icon. I think it’s because you can read the top post, voice your opinion in half a second, and move on. There’s some rule somewhere (if anyone knows the exact number let me know) that says that 1/6 of the people who read a thread will contribute to it. But when there’s really no effort involved in it, then there’s a much higher turnout.

Like I said before, it’s a much more passive exercise. Yes, I know that people have called the internet “passive” since the dawn of the millennium, especially with Youtube and the like, but that’s not what I’m talking about. Those sweet nothings use media instead of substance. I’m talking about things that are almost the same in terms of material, but we think are bettered by the fact that they are movies, music, etc.

Or, for example, take my site (I refuse to say that word, *cough*blog*cough*. Sounds like a venereal disease.) or any other text-only site. I will bet you that their traffic is nothing compared to asinine things like FailBlog, even if the material is miles better. Why? Because there’s no funny pictures, no half-second entertainment. It looks boring, so it is boring.

I am not trying to soapbox a point here, mostly because it would make me a hypocrite. I’m just stating something that I noticed. Food for the brain, yes? Maybe you’ll actually start reading those blogs, heh.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Multimedia

  1. you’re so right.
    my livejournal seemed comatique but when I posted a poll (about facebook, d’uh!), all of a sudden, my ‘friends’ crawled out of the shadows and clicked their opinion.. that is, one of the options I gave them. it was my most ‘active’ post in months.
    i will look at the video thing later and check on the escapist, both never heard of.
    I personally LIKE (sic) an illustrating image in a post or two, but it’s probably a good title that will make me read rather than that… this said, I always feel awkward when I see the Che on pop art or, worse, girly cut tee-shirts, whatever you think of the man – if you actually bother finding out about him, like I did long before his face became fashion – using his features as a graphic pattern certainly does not do him justice.

    • Heh, the Che pic was just a random one that I picked out of my files, no real meaning.

      And yeah, the Escapist and ZP are only for if you like video games, I was more referring to it for the style of writing.

      Interesting phenomenon, at any rate.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s